In defense of tentacle rape

Tentacle rape does not exist. It is a fantasy, like women wearing high heels in bed, hot chicks banging pizza delivery boys, condomless impersonal consequence-free sex, and orcs. Like many fantasies, tentacle rape will appeal to some adults. I don’t pretend to understand that particular kink, but as someone with his own kinks (Is it too much information to mention Sarah Palin here?), I’m not going to judge someone else’s fantasy.

Not all folks are that accommodating. For instance, Luke Plunkett at Kotaku and Brandon Sheffield at Insert Credit, both of whom are intelligent writers with lots of insight into and experience with the fantasy worlds of videogaming. According to circumstantial evidence, they were instrumental in getting Kickstarter to cancel the funding campaign for Tentacle Bento. Plunkett and Sheffield both objected to Kickstarter allowing the project, which is a tabletop card game with a tentacle rape theme.

After the jump, the writhing powerful clutches of moral outrage

As a guy who watches a lot of horror movies, I routinely see things I consider utterly repugnant. For instance, last night I saw a guy in a pig mask fatally stab a bunch of people for no good reason. But I recognize that presenting something doesn’t necessarily condone it or encourage people to enact it. Madison County is an awful movie, but it does not endorse serial killing. This has been the case as long as we’ve been presenting things. Oedipus Rex does not endorse incest any more than Hunger Games endorses the systematic slaughter of children.

Then there’s tentacle rape. Out of ignorance, I keep tentacle rape in a mental file with hentai, anime, manga, and Dragonball Z. Oh, that stuff. Sailor Moon, Cowboy Bebop, Gundam, and tentacle rape. Whatever. It’s all the same to me and I don’t get it.

But like many things I don’t get, I have a theory. There’s a long history of women being devoured by things from the sea. Go outside tonight and look for the familiar W-shape of the constellation Cassiopeia. She’s tied up there because of the ancient Greek equivalent of a tentacle rape (check out the story of Andromeda). Dream of a Fisherman’s Wife is an erotic woodcut from the early 19th century. It’s pretty much hardcore tentacle porn. The cover of Peter Benchley’s Jaws is iconic. Two summers ago, I watched a middling horror movie called Piranha 3D, which was about piranhas emerging from a subterranean cave and attacking a Girls Gone Wild event, which included a porno shoot. Although I mostly put Piranha 3D in the category of “middling horror movie”, I wonder if the director, who made a movie called High Tension about repressed sexuality gone horribly wrong, is commenting on pornography as a terrible force rising up from the darkness of the male id and devouring women. Or maybe he’s just looking for an excuse to get Kelly Brook to take off her top.

Like all fantasies, tentacle rape is an expression of some facet of psychology. It doesn’t impel people to rape any more than bondage fantasies impel people to tie up other random people. Healthy adults are presumably capable of separating fantasy from reality, just as they’re capable of reading Catcher in the Rye without shooting John Lennon or watching the Vice Presidential candidate debates without sending flowers and chocolates to Sarah Palin because she winked at me. Those of us who play videogames should be pretty hip to this. We have a unique understanding of the interplay between entertainment and fantasy. As such, we of all people should be tolerant of entertainment that doesn’t harm anyone or anything. So why would we object to a certain type of pornography that isn’t child pornography or crush videos? Why would we try to stop it from being made? Because we believe it encourages actual rapists? And do horror movies and videogames therefore cause actual murders?

I’m being a bit disingenuous about the case made by Sheffield and Plunkett. Or at least Sheffield, who lucidly asserted that tentacle rape and a light-hearted card game about tentacle rape trivialize actual rape (Plunkett pretty much just sputtered in agreement). But I find it troubling that Sheffield would so readily make a link between something that doesn’t actually exist and something that does actually exist, between a harmless weird fantasy and the terrible criminal violation of women. Whether the operative verb is encourage, endorse, or trivialize, Sheffield is making a dangerous argument that will lead him to places he doesn’t want to go. Burnout trivializes road rage. Call of Duty trivializes war. Saints Row trivializes murder. Pandemic trivializes the extinction of humanity. All of these statements are technically correct, but the proper response should be, “So?” Adults are capable of seeing things trivialized without internalizing that, without losing our perspective on their enormity, without then doing these things, without losing our capacity to oppose them.

Furthermore, Tentacle Bento is not a mainstream game. It existed exactly where it should exist: as a niche product intended for adults, grasping for a little crowdsourcing support. Anyone calling for it to be pulled from Kickstarter, anyone boycotting it and trying to keep it from other people, is on exactly the wrong side of the issue. Ironically, they’re also instrumental in getting it made. After calling for Tentacle Bento to get kicked from Kickstarter, Sheffield and especially Plunkett gave the project far more publicity than it ever would have gotten. Tentacle Bento is now fully funded from the developer’s site here.

By the way, I’m also offended by Tentacle Bento, but not because it’s a light-hearted look at tentacle rape. I’m offended at it because it looks like a tedious suit matching card game. Plus, I already did my term of service with an anime cheesecake card game (I accidentally played Sword Girls because — no joke — I confused it with Skull Girls). But I’m glad at the outcome of this situation. I’m just disappointed that Kickstarter caved to a knee-jerk campaign of handwringing emails in response to poorly made arguments.

If tentacle rape is harmful, so too are videogames, violent movies, and probably rap lyrics. The difference between not liking something and proscribing it is colossal. That line should not be crossed lightly. And if Kickstarter has closed the Tentacle Bento project because they think a tentacle rape card game is harmful, if Sheffield and Plunkett feel that tentacle rape encourages, trivializes, or leads to actual rape — a horrible thing that actually exists — then they have crossed that line lightly.

(The image at the top of this article is “Octopus and Girl” by eleefece.)

  • amandachen

    Absolutely awful that it got cancelled.

  • TheUnchosenOne

    My problem with the whole thing was their pitch, and the wink-wink-nudge hinting at the fact that it was a tentacle rape game. Like, fine, you’re making a tentacle rape game. You’re gross, but whatever, people can generally tell the difference between fantasy and reality. Just be honest about it. They talked about “snatching” the girls, and there was a gameplay demo that was all kinds of winking innuendo and general skeeviness. Which, yeah, I guess that’s part of the genre a little bit, but that’s where I felt it was trivializing. That they instantly denied it was about rape says a lot, I think.

    Plus they claimed it was satire, when really it’s just straight up tentacle rape.

  • Nightwish

    The uncomfortable truth is that all this is a problem because everyone screams bloody murder and wants the death penalty for anyone who has a single jpeg of child porn, or of their naked children or even dressed teenagers.
    Not that any of that is my thing, even though I watch weird porn. 

  • TheUnchosenOne

    I have read this comment several times and my only response is still “What?” What are you even saying here?

  • Cornbread

    Seriously, WTF are you talking about here? How does what you said have anything to do with tentacle rape? Why would you read what Tom wrote and post this nonsense about people going overboard with regards to child porn (I’m not even sure it’s possible to go overboard when it comes to child porn)? 

  • http://rudolphthesnowdeer.myopenid.com/ Rudolf

    Holy moley, I would never have expected videogame journous, who knows all about the Jack Thompsons of this world, to become Jack Thompsons.

  • Omnsicia

    Wouldn’t the cover of Peter Benchley’s Beast be more appropriate in this context?

  • TheUnchosenOne

    That’s an unfair comparison. Thompson said violent video games are used as “murder simulators” and was calling for government regulations, if not an outright ban. Nobody is saying that about this game.

  • Someone

    Thank you Tom.  Well said.

  • Anonymous

    I agree with your argument “hentai != real rape.” But that’s not the point. Just for kicks I searched ‘tentacle rape’ on Amazon and got no hits (the top thing was an mp3 titled “Church and Rape”). So what?

    Kickstarter is trying to be the Amazon of startups, charities, and product development. They want to be a mainstream, positive environment. But because of the nature of crowdsourcing, it would be very easy for their business plan to be hijacked by weird kinks and bad taste (see Craigslist, and the Internet). So I can see how they have to nip this sort of thing in the bud. So I don’t think this is a “freedom of expression” problem, or a “media portrayal vs real rape” problem. This is an image problem.

  • Anonymous

    Also the picture you picked does not look like tentacle rape. It’s more like “girl hangs out with pet octopus”

  • http://twitter.com/phubans Paul Hubans

    The game itself looked pretty lame; generic anime characters and cheesy, smarmy sub-plot, though it didn’t give me the impression of graphic or even really that offensive. I’m kind of surprised that there was such a knee-jerk reaction to it, specifically from men. I’m reminded of guilt complexes in psychology that drive people to go out of their way to do what they think is right, even if it goes to extremes. For example, a white person becoming offended by a joke they perceived to be racist, that in fact caused a group of black people to laugh when the joke was told to them.

    It’s this kind of overcompensating “white-knighting” (for lack of a better term) that subtly functions as a type of reverse racism, or in this case reverse-sexism, because it holds the idea (in this case) that women are weak victims who can’t speak for or stand up for themselves. In short, it just seems to be looking to create issues where there shouldn’t be any. This isn’t going to stop rape from happening, and I doubt that actual rapists even know about this game, much less care to play it.

  • Anon

    Wholeheartedly agree.

    Also, the popularity of tentacles in japan is no doubt greatly increased by their censorship laws. Penises have to be censored, phallic objects less so.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_ENK4OOZHU7ZJ5RA4TMU6JGQO5I Spammy

    Ebay sells hentai related goods but nobody accuses it of being an agent for moral degeneracy for doing so.

    Yes I agree it is more like a business decision, they don’t want to tar Kickstarter with any controversy. Yet it would be controversial however they act. I say they should just stick to the law and be the crowdsource marketplace for creatives.

  • ShirtlessKirk

    Andromeda was tied to a rock, (Queen) Cassiopeia was her mother. Then Theseus came along astride Pegasus armed with the freshly decapitated head of Medusa and ruined the whole show for all those who’d paid for a ticket.

  • Mygaffer Nunya

    I wholeheartedly agree. People need to stop trying to enforce their belief systems on other people.

  • thebigJ_A

    SO child porn is fine as long as it’s a cartoon child being molested? That’s your argument, Tom. 

  • Anon

     It’s not just octopi neither!

    http://somefield.com/wallpaper/wallpaper.html

  • Guest

     Did you search Amazon Japan? I guarantee you there, there will be quite a few products in there that contain it. Obviously, they don’t have bright flashing lights that say, “This is about tentacle rape” though.

    Kickstarter, in being a site about funding potentially artistic projects, needs a certain amount of objectivity if the site is really going to hit the big time. I don’t think anyone would object to restricting page views of adult content Kickstarters. It is, after all, a big part of the Internet and people want to fund sexual stuff, by all means.

  • Guest

    See: Daikichi Amano. I think this is a case of a few individuals who want to put blinders over the unconscious. Perversion is necessary. Fantasy is necessary. Human exploitation isn’t. It’s easy to pathologize consumers of this material, but how can anyone claim absolute knowledge of somebody else’s structure of fantasy? 

  • ValerioDeCamillis

    Actually they did imply that this game was a rape simulator and did call for a ban.

  • TheUnchosenOne

    Who did? Can you find any actual examples of this?

  • KeysE2S

     Child porn/pedophilia/pederasty = real things that are bad

    Tentacle rape = thing that doesn’t exist in the real world, so trying to assign value judgement to it comes off as an argument about aesthetics rather than morals

  • KeysE2S

     Why not ban The Accused? Or Pulp Fiction?

  • Grok231

    Well it’s Tom’s blog and he is certainly free to
    expresses whatever point of view he wants. 
    Some, perhaps many, may agree with him. 
    Nonetheless, rape is an act that, I think it is fair to say, most people
    find pretty monstrous. I’m not sure that just because rape is dressed up in a
    fetish/fantasy kind of way makes objections to using it as the basis of some
    sort of gameplay meritless.  Personally I’m not in favor of banning things.  However, when actors in the free market are
    exercising their prerogative, whether as investors or consumers, not to support
    something they disagree with, I’m not sure that it’s the same as proscription.  In any event, it’s a bit hard to reconcile the
    above criticism of the Kickstarter folks with Tom’s recent comments during his
    podcast interview of Chris Park, where Tom seemed to suggest that author Orson
    Scott Card should effectively be blacklisted because he supports a political agenda
    that Tom strongly disagrees with.

     
    Personally I’m not in favor of banning things.  However, when actors in the free market are
    exercising their prerogative, whether as investors or consumers, not to support
    something they disagree with, I’m not sure that it’s the same as proscription.  In any event, it’s a bit hard to reconcile the
    above criticism of the Kickstarter folks with Tom’s recent comments during his
    podcast interview of Chris Park, where Tom seemed to suggest that author Orson
    Scott Card should effectively be blacklisted because he supports a political agenda
    that Tom strongly disagrees with.

  • Asdf

    I think you’re mischaracterizing the real issue that arose in the Chris Park interview. The issue was Scott Card’s leveraging of his money and political affiliations to enforce his personal opinions on others by way of legislation; not his right to hold those opinions.

  • KeysE2S

    Take your first paragraph and substitute the word “murder” for “rape.”

    “I’m not sure that just because [murder] is dressed up in a
    fetish/fantasy kind of way makes objections to using it as the basis of some
    sort of gameplay meritless.”

    So…goodbye everything but dating sims and sports titles. Actually, you might have to bail on some dating sims too.

    And your second point seems to forget that Card was supporting a civil BAN on gay marriage for religious reasons. So as a non-fan of “banning” things, I think your argument here sort of collapses on itself. Unless you can explain to me how a “free market” ban on gay marriage is supposed to work.

  • Alexx Kay

    I don’t know if that’s Tom’s argument, but yes, I would totally make that argument.  See http://cbldf.org/about-us/case-files/cbldf-case-files-canada-customs-case/ for one reason why.

  • Maxim

    “If tentacle rape is harmful, so too are videogames, violent movies, and probably rap lyrics.”

    Maybe, just maybe – there could be a grain of truth to this statement?

  • thebigJ_A

    Rape is very real. If you put pointy ears on a guy in your rape porn and call him an elf, it’s still rape porn.

  • thebigJ_A

    That’s a case about Canada calling something child porn that isn’t, and a guy suffering for it. Had he been carrying actual child pornography, they’d have been justified. 

    Obviously there’s always the question of what constitutes child pornography, just like there’s always been the question of what constitutes pornography. But if you are really arguing that actual child pornography is just fine and dandy so long as it’s not a real little kid, I don’t think I want to continue any sort of discussion with you.

  • thebigJ_A

    Maybe you could be a little clearer. I don’t at all see the connection from what I said to what you ask, to the point that it appears a non sequitur. 

  • Mygaffer Nunya

     Yes, cartoon porn IS fine, even if they are cartoon children. You see for a crime to be committed there has to be an actual victim, not just something you find distasteful. So many people don’t seem to get that. So yes, in the good old USA cartoons depicting underage children in sexual situations is legal.
    We may find it pretty sick but as long as a victim isn’t involved lets try and stay away from legislating morality, ok?

  • KeysE2S

     And if your “pointy-eared” elf kills a bunch of “orcs,” it’s still murder.

  • KeysE2S

     Both films feature rape as a plot point.

  • Grok231

    Asdf, I don’t think I was mischaracterizing Tom’s position, but if I was incorrect I certainly apologize.  As I understood Tom’s comments from the podcast, he would oppose any business enterprise which hired, Card, even though it was unrelated to Card’s political views, say for example if the Valley Without Wind project had hired him (which Chris Park made clear was NOT the case).  To my mind that is the essence of a blacklist.  That’s not to say that Tom doesn’t have a legal right to boycott anyone who has any dealings with Card, but that such a position represnts an attempt not simply to oppose a political view, but to bully those who dare to interact with someone who has different views than yourself.  To my mind choosing not to invest or purchase a game with a particular topic you find objectionable, whether a “tentacle rape game”or the “heterosexual only marriage game” is a quite different and much less controversial position.  That’s why I found Tom’s comments in his post rather difficult to reconcile with his earlier podcast comments

  • thebigJ_A

    Yes, i’m aware. And? What’s them both having a plot point about rape got to do with anything?

    (Weird that i can’t reply to a reply, making this appear out of order)

  • thebigJ_A

    (again, same problem regarding replying to a reply)

    No, see, that would be murder of an orc, which is not a real thing. And in your murder example, you’re not really talking about the same sort of thing. Ye’re no longer talking about pornography, no longer talking about fantasizing about something in the same way. 

    A depiction of violence, depending how it’s done, is acceptable in our society. If, however, it were a snuff film about an orc murdering a human women, that would be more along the lines of what we’re discussing, and would be disturbing.

  • thebigJ_A

    You seem to be confusing something being legal with it being moral. Just because it’s legal in some countries (though I’d mention it’s illegal in quite a few, such as the UK) doesn’t make it ok.

    And when did I advocate legislation of any kind? Even you admit it’s sick, so you just agreed with me.

  • thebigJ_A

    reply fail, see my actual reply below

  • Transhumanplus

    Cowboy Bebop needs to be moved from your “weird stuff” mental file to the “exception to how generally terrible anime is”-file. If you’ve never watched it, I can’t recommend it more highly. I promise: no tentacles, no rape.

  • tomchick

    Grok, I abhor how Orson Scott Card and the Mormons essentially paid to foist Proposition 8 onto California (which, thankfully, had no staying power).  If you want to hire Orson Scott Card for his celebrity, you also get the baggage he’s hitched onto that celebrity.  It’s the same with, say, Jenny McCarthy’s public anti-vaccination stance.  

    Celebrities who support causes intentionally link their celebrity to that cause.  When those causes are legislated intolerance and junk science, I think it’s fair game to respond accordingly.

    I honestly have no idea how you figure that’s inconsistent with that I’ve written here.

  • lordoftheflies

    Those who act against others’ fantasies, especially when those are nothing more than fantasies, have deep seeded psychological traumas. I don’t think you need a PHD in psychology to know this either. One can only hope the crazies won’t outnumber the sane.

  • KeysE2S

    ” If you’re fantasizing about women being raped, equally something is
    wrong with you, and you need help. Your view of women is warped and
    wrong.”

    You seem to be in support of Sheffield and Plunket here. Or are you just making big hand-waving pronouncements about rape without having an opinion about the topic addressed in the article?

    If it’s OK to try to prohibit funding for a project that includes a sex crime that doesn’t exist in the real world, why aren’t you freaking about about all the other projects that include sex crimes that DO happen in the real world?

  • thebigJ_A

    Are you intentionally missing the point here? Or are you trolling me? 

    The problem isn’t that it “includes a sex crime” at all, as you obviously know. If everything that mentioned sex crimes was bad, we’d not even be able to have this conversation.

    Are you unable to see the difference between the depiction of something as part of a narrative, and the depiction for sexual gratification? Are you unable to tell the difference between, say,  reading Nabokov’s ‘Lolita’, and jerking off to pictures of twelve year old girls?

  • thebigJ_A

    Deep-seated trauma, huh? You mean like having been raped?

    Yeah, I could see that might make someone a bit touchy about rape being portrayed as a game.

  • Mygaffer Nunya

    You seem to be confusing your value system with my value system.

    I don’t find tentacle porn sick, just representations of underage children. Still, if the figure is a stick, you must acquit?