Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Seven Psychopaths - McDonagh and Farrell Team Again

  1. #1
    New Romantic
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    9,527

    Seven Psychopaths - McDonagh and Farrell Team Again

    And they're bringing Walken, Rockwell, Harrelson, and Tom Waits along for the ride.
    http://trailers.apple.com/trailers/i...enpsychopaths/

  2. #2
    New Romantic
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    7,863
    I have to see this for the cast alone. Looks fun!

  3. #3
    Social Worker
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    2,620
    Wow. Yeah, day one. (Well, not really because I suspect this won't open within 150 miles of me but hopefully my local art-house theatre will get to it eventually.)

  4. #4
    Social Worker
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    California, America
    Posts
    4,443
    Quote Originally Posted by Rightbug View Post
    Wow. Yeah, day one. (Well, not really because I suspect this won't open within 150 miles of me but hopefully my local art-house theatre will get to it eventually.)
    I believe this is getting a wide release.

    Anyways, this looks real good, though I suspect the film itself may be a tad different than the trailer suggests.

  5. #5
    Mad Chester
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    1,389
    I refuse to read anything more about this other than to clarify one point: Martin or Michael McDonagh?

  6. #6
    How To Go
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Salem, Oregon
    Posts
    11,976
    Martin

  7. #7
    Mad Chester
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    1,389
    I will accept & expect nothing lesser than In Bruges. And now to hide from this topic for several months.

  8. #8
    Social Worker
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Location?! Fack no.. You joke me?
    Posts
    2,381
    Saw a test screening of this last month and was very sadly disappointed.

    While In Bruges also had a similarly zany trailer (because no one can figure out how to market McDonagh's movies), it also had a really strong sense of story and character, propelled by some great narrative momentum. Sadly, this one has some of the interesting character bits (I mean, Rockwell is great, Walken does the Walken thing, etc.) but the story is just a little too loosey-goosey and doesn't quite cohere in a satisfying way.

    Granted, what I saw was technically a rough cut so maybe its been tightened up a bit, but yeah, it was disappointing.

  9. #9
    Neo Acoustic
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Minneapolis, Minneapolis, Minneapolis
    Posts
    1,742
    Would you say it's more like Con Air or more like Smokin' Aces?

  10. #10
    Social Worker
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Location?! Fack no.. You joke me?
    Posts
    2,381
    Heh, haven't seen either of those in their entirety. I'm fairly confident that it is not as guns blazing as Con Air though.

  11. #11
    New Romantic
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Denmark, land of Milk and Honies
    Posts
    6,770
    Anything like Smokin' Aces would be an instant watch for me.

  12. #12
    New Romantic
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ex-pat Brooklynite in the swamps of Florida.
    Posts
    6,957
    Walken. Will see.

  13. #13
    Social Worker
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    3,938
    This was the best movie I've seen this year. Adaptation meets Pulp Fiction. Smart writing, funny, violent, great characters, and totally fucking insane.

  14. #14
    How To Go
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    11,098
    Quote Originally Posted by Angrycoder View Post
    This was the best movie I've seen this year. Adaptation meets Pulp Fiction. Smart writing, funny, violent, great characters, and totally fucking insane.
    Pretty much. So much fun. So many good actors doing such wonderful things. I adore Sam Rockwell in particular.

  15. #15
    How To Go
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    14,369
    I just got back. If I hadn't seen Argo earlier today, I'd probalby be more impressed. I liked a lot of it, but the ending felt a little weak. I guess I'm also a little tired of movies about movies. The tourtured screenwriter! You know he's overcome his writer's block because you're ... watching the movie! :)

  16. #16
    New Romantic
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Madison, WI Gamertag: Dr JonDanger Steam: Jon_Danger
    Posts
    8,885
    Martin McDonaugh?!

    I am in.

  17. #17
    Spinning Toe
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Bothell, WA
    Posts
    616
    Saw this today, and while the cast was great (we need Tom Waits in more films) and there were a couple of good laughs, I ended up coming away feeling... underwhelmed, I guess. It wasn't it wasn't great, it wasn't terrible, it was just forgettable.

  18. #18
    Neo Acoustic
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    1,627
    I was initially disappointed. The first act didn't have a lot of steam. It didn't really pick up until they went out to the desert and then really hit this insane beautiful climax with Sam Rockwell's talk by the fire. Everything after that point was great too, but it took a while to get there.

  19. #19
    New Romantic
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    PSN: Moggraider GFWL: MoggBerserker
    Posts
    5,500
    Loved it. It wasn't perfect, but Rockwell, Walken, and Waits really sell it. I think it may put people off that a lot of the plot is driven by what some would call a fairly trivial impetus, but it's just a really fun flick.

  20. #20
    Social Worker
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    2,620
    My expectations were lowered for this one based on the reactions in this thread but I have to say, I loved it. Not quite as good as In Bruges but I wasn't expecting that.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •