If you've missed having someone like Paul Christoforo or Jack Thompson to heap scorn upon as an Internet villain, here's someone more despicable than 4chan ...it's the Oatmeal.com-extorting Charles Carreon.
This ambulance-chaser seems to have made his name as "Internet Lawyer" from fluking out on a Sex.com case from a few decades ago and doesn't seem to have any understanding of how the Internet works in present-day. You should see the crazy photoshop-hackjobs he and his crazy wife have done up on their blog and have the gall to disparage The Oatmeal.
He's so batshit crazy it's ridonkulous. He makes Judge Floro look sane.
Fake Carreon blog: http://censoriousdouchebag.wordpress.com
The above link contains pt1, pt2 etc and all the background.
Another summary: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearson_v._Chung
I think the part that is responsible for most of my brain bleed is the sheer level of hypocrisy (mental instability?) that it takes for Charles Carreon and Tara Carreon to post the ocean of foul, libel, and stolen material on their collection of websites, and then sue Matthew Inman and others for those very offenses.
From the Washing Post Article:
"Carreon also says he found the drawing to be disgusting. 'I think satirical content is fine,' Carreon tells The Post, 'but him accusing my mother of bestiality is revolting, and I will not forgive it.'"
Here are just a couple of examples of his own revolting content:
NSFW - http://www.american-buddha.com/poet.condoleeza.htm
NSFW - http://www.american-buddha.com/mondo.sceptre.htm
I mean, how can he defend that, not only to the Internet masses, but to himself?