
Originally Posted by
ineffablebob
I've never been a big proponent of the "All-Star Game counts" approach, but it appears to be here to stay. Given that, I don't see any reason to replace players unable to play, except to maintain a minimum playable roster. There's already more pitchers and outfielders than you need on an All-Star game roster, and having less will only make the manager's job easier when he tries to get as many as possible into the game while not gimping his team. I think they should allow replacement only if you drop below two players at a given position.