
Originally Posted by
Hugin
The problem/villain was incredibly weak and pointless. "Oh, it's a merciless killing machine....me, I know evil when I see it and that thing is evil...oh, except it's blind and scared, so it's okay that it's been wandering around killing people, and we can pet it while it dies."
Amy and The Doctor did very nearly nothing of value in the story. They didn't figure out how to defeat it, nothing. Van Gogh just stabs it and it dies, and he probably would have done that eventually on his own, considering the pitchfork action back at his house. Whatever.
When the story wouldn't have changed to any meaningful degree if your main characters had been deleted from it, that's a crappy story most of the time (it's occasionally fine for stories with an explicit "observer" character who just witnesses and then chronicles events as they unfold around them, certain war stories can work well like that). But mostly, crappy.
And then the ending was just the most pathetically manipulative thing ever. Yes, sure, I found it affecting, but irritatingly so. I mean, it's a cheap ploy they can do over and over "Let's go to the past, find someone awesome but unappreciated in their day, take them to the future and show them how great they turned out in the history books."
It was, frankly, a terrible, paper thin, undercooked, unfinished fragment of an episode with one saving grace, the performance of Tony Curran as Van Gogh. He had the look and he sold Van Gogh's various emotional states well.
Matt Smith is decent enough, and Karen Gillan is appealing as Amy even though Amy isn't very well written, but this season overall is sliding into mediocre/poor territory.