Here's my amateur theory as to why I think Prison Break and Lost are in dire trouble while Heroes and 24 aren't.
Prison Break and Lost have forseeable endings. The escapees will either get back or will be found innocent of their crimes. Plot over. The Lostees will discover the mystery of the Dharma Initiative and reconnect with the real world. Plot over. The screenwriters are forced to prolong these two plots over as many seasons as possible to bring in the advertising dollars. They do they by introducing filler segments (ping-pong contests and flashbacks and sideplot twists) in order to do so. By the very nature of their storylines in the first season the writers have already written themselves into a corner which they can't get out and have doomed their respective shows.
24 and Heroes on the other hand are different because there is no forseeable ending for either. In 24 Jack Bauer can continue to save the world season after season after season. Eventually, like Survivor 14, people will get tired and tune out until the ratings drop and the sponsors go away. As long as the writers can keep it interesting 24 may survive for a few more seasons but the writers haven't written themselves into a corner because there is no plot arc. Similar to 24, in Heroes, the plot arc (of saving the world from Evil will always be an open one. The writers can write season after season of Heroes fighting Villains; introduce new heroes with conflicted personal backgrounds and new villians with interesting powers. The show can go on and on.
Sorry for my verbosity.. typing at work .. so kinda rushed.. I think you get my point though.
The plots for PB/Lost are finite whereas the plots for Heroes/24 are not thereby jeopardizing the fanbase and ratings for PB/Lost.
Agree or disagree?


Reply With Quote