Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: QT3A - site security breach?

  1. #1
    Derek Smart [3000AD]
    Guest

    QT3A - site security breach?

    Admins (I assume that would be Chet)

    Today I've been getting security warnings from my firewall when trying to post on the site. Here is a link to the bulletin which describes it.

    As GladGuy posted here, I too was getting those Invalid_Session response errors in the past few days.

    Just an FYI for you guys to look into. It could be a false alarm on the part of Norton Firewall 2003, but you never know with these things.

  2. #2
    Social Worker
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    2,625
    Well - Someone has been updating the front page. I would call that a security breach. Wouldn't you? :lol:

  3. #3
    New Romantic
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Sleeping
    Posts
    5,855
    Nothing was change by us - Mark? Tom?

    I blame Tom. Or Norton.

    These aren't RAQ's

    Its a compaq P4.

  4. #4
    Social Worker
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Silicon Valley
    Posts
    4,690

    Re: QT3A - site security breach?

    Quote Originally Posted by Derek Smart [3000AD
    ]Admins (I assume that would be Chet)

    Today I've been getting security warnings from my firewall when trying to post on the site. Here is a link to the bulletin which describes it.

    As GladGuy posted here, I too was getting those Invalid_Session response errors in the past few days.

    Just an FYI for you guys to look into. It could be a false alarm on the part of Norton Firewall 2003, but you never know with these things.
    The only time I get invalid_session messages is when I've disabled cookies in the browser...

    Loyd

  5. #5
    Derek Smart [3000AD]
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by graller
    Well - Someone has been updating the front page. I would call that a security breach. Wouldn't you? :lol:
    LOL!!!! Good point that

    Quote Originally Posted by Chet
    Nothing was change by us - Mark? Tom?

    I blame Tom. Or Norton.

    These aren't RAQ's

    Its a compaq P4.
    Oh ok. But I've never seen that one before except for today. I'll be damned if I'm gonna let some script kiddie hijaak our site again!!! (anyone remember that one?) - I was just about ready to roll up my sleeves and go find the focker. :D

    What will all these guests and Huffman and his friends now trying to turn the site into a battle field, you can expect anything from them. I'm just going to sit back and watch. :roll:

  6. #6
    World's End Supernova
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    15,829
    Quote Originally Posted by Chet
    Nothing was change by us - Mark? Tom?

    I blame Tom. Or Norton.

    These aren't RAQ's

    Its a compaq P4.
    I don't know how to change anything. I can type words and make them appear on the front page, but that's about it.

  7. #7
    Social Worker
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    3,821
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Asher
    I don't know how to change anything. I can type words and make them appear on the front page, but that's about it.
    LOL Mark !

  8. #8
    New Romantic
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    7,361
    (cues up Copland's Fanfare for the Common Man)

  9. #9
    Social Worker
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    My Crib
    Posts
    2,870
    This is sort of unrelated, but Derek, why do you keep calling this site QT3A? (I've noticed it a few times in the past couple of days.) This isn't Quarter to Three: Arena... :D

  10. #10
    Administrator New Romantic
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    FLIP CITY
    Posts
    8,201
    I sure wish it was though. IM TAKIN TYJENKS DOWN

  11. #11
    voltaic
    Guest
    I'm questioning the wisdom of running a firewall 1) in software and 2) on the very computer you are protecting. Unless Derek is running it on another dedicated computer, in which case I still question the wisdom, I simply retract the implication that Derek doesn't have said wisdom. :lol:

  12. #12
    New Romantic
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    benching coffins full of dead babies
    Posts
    5,020
    I run ZoneAlarm Pro on the machine directly connected to the cable modem at home (and then that machine shares the connection to two others via ZA's version of ICS). It's a home network, I don't need a dedicated hardware firewall. Zone Alarm is better then the BlackICE crap that comes with XP, too.

  13. #13
    New Romantic
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    7,361
    You're crazy. Hardware nat/firewalls with 4-port switches and including a wireless access point can be had for $80. They are vastly superior to all software alternatives short of pro-level Linux router installs.

    I recommend the D-link DI-614+. The feature set of inexpensive routers these days is nothing short of amazing.

  14. #14
    Bub, Andrew
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by wumpus
    (cues up Copland's Fanfare for the Common Man)
    Stallone was great in that one.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •