Do you read Brian Koontz' posts?

[XPav]

I sure as hell don't.

[Poops McGee]

Are you kidding? I love his books! "Watchers" is my favorite!

[Kraaze]

Absolutely I do. You can't get entertainment like that just anywhere. He isn't abusive even when vilified which is a nice change from everyone else on the Internet. Sometimes his bizarro slant on things is thought provoking, even if I haven't agreed with him yet.

[Timemaster Tim]

If I have the time to spare for a good laugh, I'll read it. But usually, I just skip his posts assuming the words to interesting content ratio just isn't high enough to be bothered with.

[Dave Markell]

I always at least skim them. On occassion there's something thought provoking; more frequently there's a hilarious Kootzism I wouldn't want to miss.

[Kalle]

I just wait for the Cryptian highlights.

[Jobe]

If he starts a thread topic, I'll read his first post. Anything after that is generally just him taking hundreds of words to say "I agree with myself", and I don't get anything out of reading that unless he really puffs out his chest ala the Anaxagoras commentary.

[Kyle Wilson]

I usually get two or three sentences in, become baffled as I encounter sentence after sentence devoid of meaning, look back up at the poster's name, realize I've done it again, and skip on down to the inevitable DrCrypt response.

[Bill Dungsroman]

I use the next few posts after his as a cue. If nobody says much, or is responding like he's any other poster, I'll ignore him. If it's 2 or 3 "WTF was that nonsense? Koontz, you've outdone yourself" - well, how can I not read it? I'd have missed his bizarre fictional conversation with Samantha Ryan Koontz had in his head to prove us all wrong.

[Sean Tudor]

Yes but mostly by accident. They start off reasonably normal and then they go downhill towards the end of the post.

[Dirt]

Few things are more entertaining than reading Koontz and DrCrypt (the Anti-Koontz) go at it.

[Mike Cathcart]

I don't know what to do here, because I don't read XPav's posts. So what's this about?

[Sean Tudor]

So what's this about?

Brian Koontz.

[Qenan]

I sure as hell don't.

I wanted a "once in a while" option. Or maybe a "I skim them" option. Generally I skim past the first few sentences.

[Jobe]

"One must deconstruct the Shit before access is granted to the Bonerz." -- Brian Koontz

[quatoria]

So what's this about?

Brian Koontz.

Koontz. Brian Koontz. He'll take a dry inanity, shaken, not stirred.

[nutsak]

I sure as hell don't.

I wanted a "once in a while" option. Or maybe a "I skim them" option. Generally I skim past the first few sentences.

I do that too. So I clicked YES. then deleted my cookie for here and clicked NO.

actually - I didn't. If I wasn't lazy I would have. :roll:

[Joe O'Malley]

I find that Koontz is a bit too digitally windy for me. I usually try to go with the highlights as others post them, or will sometimes break down and read a post if it looks like it's generated some responses.