Ask Snoop

[Gary Whitta]

www.asksnoop.com

[cyborg]

No.

[Dave Markell]

Fo' shizzle.

[DennyA]

know what I'm sayin'? .. I just want an orgasm!

I remember trying place a number on my opinion of Anachronox n' shit. I finally settled on an 84%, considering da horrible missing section 'n abrupt ending (I wasn't in much disfavor over da early part) balanced by da otherwise fine game, know what I'm sayin'? I felt happy, sated in my justification, at peace wit da world, know what I'm sayin'?

Then I began worry n' shit. The 84%, which as a baby wuz so shiny 'n nice, began wrinkle." It turned yellow around da edges." The characters began get me." As they became ripe 'n voluptuous, da 84% paled wit embarassment n' shit. The cinematography began get me, know what I'm sayin'?

As 84% looked on in insecurity, I began examine that shiznit, know what I'm sayin'? What had I done? Did I begin in da mid 90s, 'n start deducting fo' flaws? Was 84% da final verdict? Otherwise Great Game - Flaws = 84% in some sort of equation that leads truth?

To this day I don't know." Stone deaf 'n dumb I gots be n' shit. But I'll push 84% da left siiiiide of da stage 'n see if I can reach da edge n' shit. ..

I remember not liking da gameplay much, know what I'm sayin'? I remember playing da game continue da bomb diggity plot along, a plot that abruptly self-destructed which led a lot of initial disappointment after finishing da game, know what I'm sayin'? From da time I finished da game till now, my opinion of da game has increased substantially, know what I'm sayin'?

I'm now wondering 'bout da whole "moral calculus" model which produced my 84%, as well, know what I'm sayin'? In da standard review score, a game strength 'n a game flaw that are equally balanced cancel each other out n' shit. Gamespot (if I remember right) takes that shiznit one step further, by dividing a game into five categories n' shit. .. a strength in one category cancels out a flaw in another n' shit.

I can only imagine what long forgotten games I would has given a score higher than 84% ." Long forgotten because while doing nothing poorly, they did nothing bomb diggity, know what I'm sayin'? Nothing remember, know what I'm sayin'?

I suppose I could just raise da score n' shit. Call that shiznit a "tilt" 'n readjust my fly a mo' comfortable position, know what I'm sayin'? A new baby from fresh loins, hoping this time that shiznit doesn't get yellow, know what I'm sayin'?

That seems wrong n' shit. Perhaps its better instead clinically examine da strengths 'n weaknesses of a game, but base da score entirely on da game's subjective effect, know what I'm sayin'? So." ..

Awesome Game = I would butt-slam a deceased poodle* fo' da right play this game." I played da game constantly fo' a long period of time." I thought 'bout da game when I wasn't playing." This game still has a warm place in my heart 5 years after playing." This game changed my life n' shit.

Terrible Game = Pay me $100,000 'n ax me play this game, 'n I will laugh in yo' face n' shit.

Very Good Game = A lukewarm spot in my heart 'n a warm hardness under my pants."

* No Poodles wuz harmed in da making of this post n' shit. The 84%, however, had its ass severely kicked n' shit. While PETA is as happy as they ever get (which is be like, not currently foaming at da mouth), da NAA (Numerical Association of America) is asking fo' my incarceration n' shit.

You know, I think it actually makes more sense this way.

[nutsak]

Penny-arcade is amazing to read with this shiznit.

[Kalle]

know what I'm sayin'? .. I just want an orgasm!
........

You know, I think it actually makes more sense this way.

Seems that great minds think alike, but I get strange errors with both Opera and IE when I try to Snoopify anything on QT3.

However, the Universal translator was happy to help me translate Koontz into Skinhead.



.., right, mate? Oi just want an orgasm!

Oi remember tryin' to place a fookin' number on moi opinion o' Anachronox, fook me! Oi finally settled on an 84%, considerin' der horrible missin' section 'n abrupt endin' ( Oi wasn't in much disfavor over der early part) balanced by der otherwise fine game, fook me! Oi felt happy, sated in moi justification, at peace wiv der world.

Then Oi began to worry, naw shittin' ya! Der fookin' 84%, which as a fookin' baby wuz so shiny 'n nice, began to wrinkle, right, mate? It fookin' turned yellow around der edges, fook me! Der fookin' characters began to get to me, fook me! As they became ripe 'n voluptuous, der 84% paled wiv embarassment, naw shittin' ya! Der fookin' cinematography began to get to me.

As 84% looked on in insecurity, Oi began to examine it, naw shittin' ya! Wot had Oi done? Did Oi begin in der mid 90s, 'n start deductin' fer flaws? Was 84% der final verdict? Otherwise Great Game - Flaws = 84% in some sort o' equation tha' leads to truth?

To dis day Oi don't know, right, mate? Stone deaf 'n dumb Oi gotta be, right, mate? But I'll push 84% to der left side o' der stage 'n see if Oi can reach der edge...

Oi remember not likin' der gameplay much, naw shittin' ya! Oi remember playin' der game to continue der fookin' brill plot along, a fookin' plot tha' abruptly self-destructed which led to a fookin' lot o' initial disappointment after finishin' der game, naw shittin' ya! From der time Oi finished der game till now, moi opinion o' der game has increased substantially.

I'm now wonderin' about der whole "moral calculus" model which produced moi 84%, as well, naw shittin' ya! In der standard review score, a fookin' game strength 'n a fookin' game flaw tha' der fook is equally balanced cancel each other out, naw shittin' ya! Gamespot (if Oi remember right) takes the fook it 'un step further, by dividin' a fookin' game into five categories.., naw shittin' ya! a fookin' strength in 'un category cancels out a fookin' flaw in another.

Oi can only imagine wot long forgotten games Oi would have given a fookin' score higher than 84% to, right, mate? Long forgotten because while doin' nothin' poorly, they did nothin' great, fook me! Nothin' to remember.

Oi suppose Oi could just raise der score, naw shittin' ya! Call the fook it a fookin' "tilt" 'n readjust moi fly to a fookin' fookin' comfortable position, naw shittin' ya! A fookin' new baby from fresh loins, hopin' dis time the fook it doesn't get yellow.

tha' seems wrong, naw shittin' ya! Perhaps its better instead to clinically examine der strengths 'n weaknesses o' a fookin' game, but to base der score entirely on der game's subjective effect, naw shittin' ya! So...

Awesome Game = Oi would butt-slam a fookin' deceased poodle* fer der right to play dis game, right, mate? Oi played der game constantly fer a fookin' long period o' time, right, mate? Oi thought about der game when Oi wasn't playing, right, mate? Dis game still has a fookin' warm place in moi heart 5 years after playing, right, mate? Dis game changed moi life.

Terrible Game = Pay me $100,000 'n ass me to play dis game, 'n Oi gonna laugh in y' fookin' face.

Very Good Game = A fookin' lukewarm spot in moi heart 'n a fookin' warm hardness under moi pants.

* Naw fookin' Poodles wuz harmed in der makin' o' dis post, fook me! Der fookin' 84%, however, had its ass severely kicked, right, mate? While PETA der fook is as happy as they ever get (which der fook is to say, not currently foamin' at der mouth), der NAA (Numerical Association o' America) der fook is askin' fer moi incarceration.

[Union Carbide]

U.S. touts N. Korea talks success

"Some muthas are disappointed wit da outcome of meetings, which wuz not as substantial as they has expected," Chinese Foreign Minister Li Zhaoxing be like, know what I'm sayin'? "However, we should highly value efforts made by izzall sides in this process, know what I'm sayin'? "

But da U.S. wuz buoyed after izzall but da North agreed da goal of complete, verifiable 'n irreversible dismantlement of Pyongyang's nuclear programs."