Erik Andersson
09-27-2003, 06:43 AM
For almost any hardware related problem you can be sure that the suggestion to defragment comes up. It almost seems like something sacred, even though I suppose this is only true for people who have used FAT12/16/32. The problem is just that I don't see how defragmentation would solve problems not related to loading or storing files quickly.
As I see it there could be three main areas of problems originating from data fragmentation:
1) The harddrive fails to handle loading data from different locations on the drive, causing it to return corrupted data. This seems rather unlikely in general.
2) The filesystem driver fails to handle fragmentation properly, meaning that it returns corrupted data or that it causes instability in some other way. This is more likely, even though I think the driver should be rather stable after all these years.
3) The slowness caused by fragmentation results in crashes in applications. I don't really see how this could be the case, even though I suppose it could happen.
Does anyone who suggest defragmentation as an answer know the reason why it would solve problems (other than the problem of files loading slowly)?
As I see it there could be three main areas of problems originating from data fragmentation:
1) The harddrive fails to handle loading data from different locations on the drive, causing it to return corrupted data. This seems rather unlikely in general.
2) The filesystem driver fails to handle fragmentation properly, meaning that it returns corrupted data or that it causes instability in some other way. This is more likely, even though I think the driver should be rather stable after all these years.
3) The slowness caused by fragmentation results in crashes in applications. I don't really see how this could be the case, even though I suppose it could happen.
Does anyone who suggest defragmentation as an answer know the reason why it would solve problems (other than the problem of files loading slowly)?