What do you get when you cross Buffy and Bayonetta? Not Lollipop Chainsaw.

There are precious few moments of inspiration in Lollipop Chainsaw. Such as running zombies down with a combine while You Spin Me Right Round plays. The combine handles like a zamboni. The unspectacular zombie splatter is one of the many casualties of this plasticky personality-less use of the Unreal engine. It’s certainly not inspired for the gameplay. But the value is in the idea, which is funny enough to sustain itself both times it happens. Lollipop Chainsaw needs about ten more ideas this good.

Instead, it has zombie basketball, zombie baseball, chainsaw dash courses, rote boss battles, a whole level of tedious retro games, and a lot of pointless twirling combat amid plasticky gore, rainbows, and pink hearts. Lollipop Chainsaw isn’t much of a game. It is a collection of poorly executed gimmicks and a heroine who occasionally chirps “What the dick?”.

I expect more from writer James Gunn and producer Goichi Suda after the wonderfully subversive Super and Killer 7. But Lollipop Chainsaw delivers on the same level as Scooby Doo and No More Heroes: lowbrow jokes, crass pandering, and a blithe disregard for meaningful characters or gameplay. One of the survivors you rescue has to go get another tampon. Another one has shit his pants. If you got your britches in a twist over the bad guys calling Catwoman a bitch in Arkham City, this game will send you into paroxysms of indignation over the insults hurled at the heroine. Levels are named after George Romero, Dan O’Bannon, and Lucio Fulci. Get it? Ten percent of the banter between the heroine and her boyfriend is really funny. Ninety percent of it isn’t.

If you want to play a shallow fighting game that combines bad humor, cheesecake, and gore, Splatterhouse would be delighted to get a little of your attention. It knows what it is and it delivers. But the gravest insult in Lollipop Chainsaw is that it’s such an obvious and vapid attempt at Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Bayonetta. You, ma’am, are no Bayonetta.

1 star
Xbox 360

  • D.Z.

    For some reason, I totally mistook that game for shadows of the damned, or whatever that was called. Thus, I had forgotten it even existed and I think I’ll go on forgetting about it.

  • amandachen

    Flashbacks to Stacy: Attack of the Schoolgirl Zombies

  • Anon

    That’s too bad, style over substance is pretty expected, but at least the style has to be styling.

    Speaking of Bayonetta, its director Hideki Kamiya had the only new game announced at E3 I really care about: P-100(ok, Watch Dogs seems like it might be interesting). Also the only Wii-U exclusive, because I’m sure Rayman Legends will be running on your toaster come 2013. Nintendo did not even deign to mention it in their conference, naturally.

  • Michael Barnes

    Sucker Punch: The Game.

    I don’t think I’ve ever seen a game that panders more than this lowest common denominator garbage. It’s a shame Suda will likely never make another game as great as Killer 7, which was truly weird and surreal instead of forced and contrived.

    80s jokes? Really? As if zombies weren’t overdone enough…

  • Killnsfun

    reading the other reviews, I think your full of crap. With all the 9s this game is getting, I have to say that you are not only a piss poor reviewer, but a piss poor gamer as well.

  • Bigdaddy73

    A 1 out of 5? Seriously? Even if you didn’t like it to give it a 1 out of 5 is ludicrous. Does it have bad graphics, sound, and is unplayable? Then maybe. Otherwise STFU.

  • Hooty McBoob

    LOL at anyone that listens to Tom Chick about anything. The moron couldnt even put together a real review.

  • Fabian Molano

    This review focuses almost entirely on the premise and almost nothing on anything else important to a video game.  Basically, this review is terrible. :>

  • BobMcFakeName

    Looks like you pissed off this game’s one internet fan, Tom :)

  • http://twitter.com/clwheeljack Charles Wheeler

    If zombies and suda51 can’t win you over, Tom, the game must be poor indeed.

    I’ll probably still pick it up eventually for my Exploitation shelf.

  • Luckydan79

    1 out of five? Oh wait the site’s name is Quarter to Three nuff said.

    Its a bad thing to stay up to Quarter to Three playing a new video game am I right? It’s the same thing how Joystiq reviewed Dragon’s Dogma. Might have to put some substance in the review.

    You broke the first rule of the holy commandants. “THOU SHALL NOT COMPARE WORKS WITH EACH OTHER”. That’s the substance you missed. Also you are trolling hardcore

    Let me give you an fine example to get it through your thick head. Lets say you found a wicked puzzle game, I write a review and compare it to Tetris. Since the game is NOT BETTER than Tetris I give it a 1 out of 5 or whatever score people use.

    Or a more recent example a review I shall use without even reading it. Pandemic. Lets say its not better than Atom Zombie Smash, I shall not mention anything else but the story and presentation is bad and keep on comparing it. Even though they are different games I DONT GIVE A SHIT LIKE YOU. So I give it a 1 out of 5 because its not better than said game.

    Please WRITE A REVIEW LIKE A GAME AND STOP COMPARING IT TO OTHER GAMES.

  • Magnalon

    To be perfectly honest, your complaints are fairly valid, but we live in an odd world where a 4 paragraph review on a personal blog is incorporated into Metacritic/Gamerankings.

  • Dunn_ace

    Wait, did youatk no more heroes as one of Sudas failures?

    You sir are in no position to affect the metacritic of this game.

  • Russell Gorall

    Maybe you are justifying a purchase, or just eat up any crap Suda 51 does.

  • midloo

    Please stop reviewing games.  You are trolling for views.  It works, but fuck you.  Seriously… fuck you hard.  

    I’m sure you’re aware that some developer’s paychecks are based on aggregated review scores.  I don’t think that’s a good idea because fools like you shouldn’t be able to have an effect on anything outside of your mother’s basement.  Shame on you.  

  • midloo

    To all those annoyed at Quarter To Three constant barrage of negative reviews in order to generate views: I would encourage you to send messages to the admins of Gamerankings and Metacritic and ask that Quarter To Three be removed from their sites so that they don’t affect the aggregate scores.  This site is a sham.  

  • Magnalon

    Tom Chick has been reviewing games and participating in the game writing-sphere before most of us were old enough to have a job.

    Still, I think 4 paragraphs, with barely any explanation in regards to how the game actually *plays* (besides saying “it’s not Bayonetta”) is very odd, and uncharacteristic of even Tom’s other writing.

    Look at his in-depth lengthy Diablo III review here on the site: something doesn’t add up.

  • midloo

    Then maybe it’s time for him to retire.  Opinion is one thing, but being a troll to generate views is another.  You’re right – something doesn’t add up. 

  • bew

     I doubt anything Killnsfun had to say had anything to do with justifying his purchase. This reviewer obviously didn’t even write a review. Four paragraphs isn’t a review. I would also gladly eat up the “crap” that Suda does. Mainly because it is fun.

  • Anon

    Yes, everyone must conform to the aggregate consensus. Especially since these sites are not in any way heavily dependent on the publishers and rabid fans, no sir. They certainly don’t grade games based on their perceived accessibility and marketability either, just doesn’t happen. I’m glad we have such a robust game press to inform us.

  • Developer, PR & families

    Uh oh, metacritic rape means some wont be 
    getting bonus checks now.

  • amandachen

    The holy commandants. LOL

  • My Opinion

    Can I just ask; what the hell does your second paragraph mean?

  • Bob Richardson

     Shut the fuck up. You haven’t even played it.

  • My Opinion

    That is the fault of the industry not the reviewer.  If Tom believes that the score is justified he should publish that score.

  • InspectorSpacetime

    Apparently the standards for 1 star have risen. I always assumed it was for a game that was fundamentally broken or unplayable. Not one you just didn’t like and couldn’t bother to throw together a full review for.

  • My Opinion

    As I said above me shitty industry practices shouldn’t affect criticism.  This is a review not a press release.

  • Ethan Wynsma

    This sounds exactly like The Darkness 2! Bad story, over the top violence and extremely shallow and repetitive….but wait, you gave The Darkness 2 a 5/5! I would take this review much more seriously if you actually wrote an in depth review and not 4 tiny paragraphs mostly complaining about its strange humour that you didn’t enjoy. How your blog ended up on Metacritic I have no idea.

  • camden

    Apparently the reviewer has never heard of a B movie. nor do i believe they actually played the game. 4 out of 5 easy. and what’s with comparing everything to bayonetta. this site called Shadows of the damned a bayonetta wannabe. nothing alike.

  • Suckit

    Wow, just, wow. Never heard of this site or the reviewer and linked here due to the low rating on metacritic and I am in shock, after reading this review, on how you can’t even affect on score there. This is a piss poor review where you compare it to Bayonetta. How in the hell can you compare? What did you compare Shadows of the Damned to? RE5? Since you didn’t go into hardly any detail with your review, then I am not going to take the time to explain why you are a dick and just leave it at that. You dick.

  • Suckit

    And writing this on a damn iPad sucks ass

  • tomchick

    Somehow I doubt the angry internet squad would be appeased if I wrote a ten paragraph review.  However, I’m happy to answer any questions about the game if anyone wants more specifics.

    Let’s see, six levels, about five hours of gameplay, earn coins to buy new moves, light stun attack and heavy damage attack, dodge button, spend medals to unlock skins and concept art, replay levels for high scores on leaderboards, achievements, bad animation.  I suppose I could have stretched that stuff out into several paragraphs, but I don’t really see the point.

    Seriously, though, I’m happy to answer any questions.

  • camden

    why are you a stupid asshole?

  • Michael Barnes

    Awesome, thanks for the insightful and intelligent response, kid.

    I’m smart enough to gauge where this game is heading based on the wealth of marketing available for it. I’m also smart enough to know that it’s the kind of game that fanboys and bloggers will pitch a shitfit over if someone doesn’t bend over backwards to laud how brilliant and clever it all is.

    It’s a crude-looking, sleazy game filled with moronic pop culture cues and showboating references to obscurites like Fulci films. It’s marketed for the “bewbs and ’dew” crowd, which I am not a part of.

    So tell me why I _should_ play this trash?

    Oh that’s right…you’ve not played it either. You can’t. 

  • midloo

    Agreed – but I also see no justification for a review score that low in the review.  Neither do I see it from any of the youtube videos I’ve watched or other reviews I have read.  The game is not technically broken.  It is playable – therefore it can safely be reviewed based on its subjective merits.  That doesn’t appear to have been done here. 

  • Bigdaddy73

     How are the graphics? How about the sound? Controls? Important things like that should be talked about.

  • camden

    I’ve Played it, it’s great.

  • Michael Barnes

    “You broke the first rule of the holy commandants. “THOU SHALL NOT COMPARE WORKS WITH EACH OTHER”.”

    Which is one of the fundamental functions of criticism in ALL media. Yeah Tom, don’t do that. Keep it to a feature list, talk about each mode, mention the graphics, and then give a softball “rox” or “sux” opinion.

    This guy probably also wants to read “objective” reviews…

  • Suckit

    Sounds like you gave a bad review on a game that you felt burned by. My biggest complaint with most games is length. Getting 5 hours out of a game that I just dropped 60bucks on does burn my ass sometimes. Homefront was the worst. I won’t fault you there. but you gotta admit; your review was pretty piss poor.

  • bawlsforface

    Oh look, it’s the guy who gave Journey 2 out 5 stars. Nice trolling, Chick! Baiting for hits again, I see. And just over 300 words? This is closer to a tweet than a review. 
    Move along people, nothing about this review to take seriously.

  • Michael Barnes

    Yeah, if Tom were writing for Consumer Reports, those things would be very important to help guide your purchase decision.

    But no, Tom is a games critic, and one of the only ones that actually has the balls to have an opinion and stand by it.

    If you want a feature list, why don’t you just go to the Lollipop Chainsaw Web site?

  • tomchick

    Graphics are ugly.  As I mentioned in the review, it’s the Unreal engine, as plastic and personality free as ever.  

    What do you mean “how about the sound”? It’s, uh, audible. Some cute licensed music and a bunch of indie zombie punk stuff.  The voice actors would probably be good if the dialogue weren’t so frequently unfunny.  The lead character is voiced by the woman who does Harley Quinn in the Batman games, but you’d never know by the stereotypical blonde cheerleader schtick.  The boyfriend is pretty good.  The bosses are all awful.Controls are fine, but this isn’t a very finicky fighting game.  You can get through it on normal using a handful of moves.  Until you get to the retro levels, at which point you’re playing an entirely different game.
    And, for the record, I don’t think those things necessarily need to be talked about.  Sometimes a short concise review is better than the usual checklist of graphics, sound, and controls.  You can get that from various other review sites, where they’ll sometimes even helpfully label the sections for you!

  • 4 par

    The only thing I learned from this review was to never listen to Quarter to Three

  • Marty Runyon

    Tom, if you’re in the mood to answer questions, is it too bad to enjoy even in an ironic, “this is so terrible you have to see this” sort of way?

  • Panteiakos

    The usual classic attention whore of metacritic which scores all time low in order to attract people.

  • Bigdaddy73

     LOL. OK I will.

  • tomchick

    I would still wave you off this one, Marty. The fighting is just so tedious and repetitive. And the attempt at B-movie schlock factor is just kind of depressing given that James Gunn did the writing.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jason-McMaster/607680289 Jason McMaster

    Always amuses me to see what makes people angry. Max Payne 3 low score? no problem. Lollipop Chainsaw? HOLLLLLY BALLLLLLLLLLSSS

    Has to be because Suda51 has a pretty big fan base. Also, sigh, how can you dislike No More Heroes. We have much to talk about.

  • http://www.facebook.com/mario.rodriguezgonzalez.9 Mario Rodríguez González

    Well, well.

    No comments on gameplay, replayability, campaign length, game modes, graphics, sound, controls, content… well, you know, the shit that actually MAKES up a game. Just a four paragraph rant full of “I don’t like the premise” whining and descriptions of game elements in 4 words at best. 

    Silly you. Don’t they teach to argument the points you make in writing 101 anymore? Actually, don’t they teach to use full sentences to ellaborate on a statement? This looks like what a 5th grader could produce if asked to review a game, only with more pedantic words. And the added arrogance of claiming to be able to judge a game you haven’t played just through your “intelligence”.
    Intelligent people, sir, know full well not to talk about something they have no first hand experience of, or an incomplete one. That’s only something ignorants and fools do. Well, that and boasting of their “intelligence” while showing in their manner of expression how sadly they lack it.I am fatally unimpressed.

  • Peter Michelsen

    Nofrikkenway!

    You read a review… And all you got out of it was a lousy opinion?

    You sir, have been robbed.