The worst thing you’ll see all week: Pitch Black

I honestly can’t tell you how I ended up watching Pitch Black on Netflix. It’s one of those things that just happened, not unlike waking up in Bangkok with a tattoo on your face or a shaved head. I might have mistakenly remembered that it’s a cult classic and that my sense of disappointment from seeing it in theaters over ten years ago was misplaced. That way lies madness. That way lies rewatching things like Soldier, Dune, or Stargate.

Pitch Black is awful. The writing is terrible, the production design is cheap, and the dramatic tension is entirely artificial. The cast mostly flounders, particularly poor Vin Deisel under the misguided notion that he’s the most bad-ass intergalactic criminal since that guy who didn’t like Mark Hamill either. When Deisel goes nose-to-nose with a space bat, lunging left and right to stay in its blind spot as it turns its head, Pitch Black loses its last faint shred of credibility. The worst sin any movie can commit is to betray its own conceit. Here is a movie about terrible terrible space bats that will eat you if you venture into the dark, except for all the times various characters venture into the dark and don’t get eaten.

It’s kind of cool seeing Claudia Black considering how much I hear her in videogames like Uncharted, Mass Effect, and Dragon Age. And I’ve always liked Radha Mitchell, who somehow seems to rise about the various genre stinkers she’s been in. Which reminds me, hey, she was in that Silent Hill movie! That wasn’t so bad, was it? Maybe I should watch that again, since I actually ended up with the Silent Hill DVD somehow, which is a bit like waking up in Vegas with a missing tooth and a tiger in the bathroom.

  • Lokust

    The only think I can really agree with in this post is that the production design is cheap.  My wife and I love this movie.

  • Pavel

    Yeah I really like Pitch Black too. It launched Vin’s career and deservedly so. Great atmosphere with little budget, great concept, and Riddick is a genuine bad ass. Too bad the Chronicles sucked.

    At least games were great though.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Brian-Rucker/100000745851295 Brian Rucker

    I actually was pretty impressed too.  It wasn’t high budget but they made a decent show of it anyhow.  It was good gritty softcore sci-fi.  Now I may be slightly biased because the idea of Vin Deisel as a rabid D&D player delights me.  But not so biased that I wouldn’t admit to absolutely hating the Chronicles of Riddick movie.  It was a pile of cliches and bad choices orbiting a terrible Mary Sue character.  Riddick in Pitch Black was an over the top, but escapist good fun, tough guy.  Riddick in Chronicles was evidently an ubergod among men.  That took all of the fun out of it.

  • http://www.facebook.com/draginol Brad Wardell

    I’m not saying you’re a bad person for not liking this movie.  But…I’m not saying you’re not.

  • Goopah

    Wow. I cannot imagine anyone hating this movie. I actually disliked Vin Diesel before I saw this film back in the day, and nearly didn’t see it because he was in it. But I wound up greatly enjoying both the movie, and his acting (and everyone else’s acting as well). Pure escapist sci-fi, but I was greatly impressed with how much they achieved with so little. And the DVD commentary track was vastly interesting. Possibly I’d be less thrilled if I saw it again today, but at the time, I was riveted to the screen through several viewings.

  • EHX

    I’m surprised you hadn’t seen this yet. This movie was kind of a big deal, at least at its home release. I had a few friends that really enjoyed it. I wasn’t entirely put off by the movie, but I did feel it was overrated considering how much they hyped it.

  • Joe

    Really, Tom, this reads like something I’d expect from Alex Litel.

  • Anonymous

    Oh, I’d seen Pitch Black before, EHX.  I saw it when it came out.  And I think we can all agree with Brian Rucker pointing out that it’s better than the movie sequel, in which someone decided the Pitch Black universe deserved it’s own Dune style treatment.  Ugh.  At least Pitch Black feels like a self-contained shipwreck yarn.

    Maybe the bar is just so low for sci-fi, but I was really disappointed in all the jerking around with the “is-he-or-isn’t-he-ruthless?” stuff.  It seemed the movie tried to have it both ways without taking a stand.  Some of the better Westerns do that sort of thing perfectly.  To me, Pitch Black was just a muddled attempt at shades-of-gray morality that didn’t have the courage to stay dark.  And while I really like Vin Deisel, he’s not fooling me.  The guy’s a dopey good-natured jock and he simply can’t hide it. :)

    By the way, does anyone know if Outland, the sci-fi High Noon with Sean Connery and Peter Boyle, holds up?  

  • Sarkus

    I’m not saying Pitch Black is great, but its a hell of a lot better then most sci-fi we see, especially in the “Alien” inspired crowd.  I’m not sure how someone who revels in obvious “B” movie sci-fi can decide this is what he wants to rant about.  Especially this long after release.

  • Anonymous

    Yeah!

    Wait, who’s ranting? A guy who rediscovers a movie is as bad as he remembered it is ranting now? Egad!

    But you are right that Pitch Black is better than most bad sci-fi. That’s a pretty low bar to clear. Nearly as low a bar as bad horror or bad romantic comedies. At least we agree that it’s not “great”.

  • Anonymous

    Man, that’s just *mean*. That’s mean, man. /James Coburn

  • Hahahabonk

    Sure it’s not great but I, and I think most people in these comments so far, take issue with your summation of Vin. He does play the uncaring playful psycho quite well. When this film was made he hadn’t yet established himself as the goofy hero inscribed on your psyche. I think your re-viewing has tainted your respect-o-scope.

    C. 

  • Paul W.

    I’ll just say that as a lover of B movies and sci-fi that dares to diverge from the Aliens/1984 style futurism this movie pleased the pants right off of me. I love Claudia Black from Farscape, and the juxtaposition of how the only thing separating the bounty hunter and Riddick is the price on his head. Not really worth going into detail here since your snark was so good, but I’m glad you reminded me of this movie which I have to have watched at least half a dozen times.

  • Hahahabonk

    Having revisted this ‘review’, perhaps after a few beers, this is where I take issue:
    “When Deisel goes nose-to-nose with a space bat, lunging left and right to stay in its blind spot as it turns its head, Pitch Black loses its last faint shred of credibility. The worst sin any movie can commit is to betray its own conceit.”
    By this stage the movie has already established that the alien bats spot people by movement, not by seeing in darkness. Riddick gets this and reacts accordingly, to his benefit. Perfectly in keeping with the movie’s conceit!
    But I’ll give you a pass for the Silent Hill reference. Not because of Rhahdhah Mitchell. But because Sean Bean was in there. And being amazing.

    C.

  • Hahahabonk

     Hell, my suits are worth more than that!
    C.

  • VendoViper

    Honestly Outland is a movie I will still watch regularly, it is very enjoyable and very Connery.  If you are asking does it hold up as a movie, yes, but the cheesy effects get worse every year.  Also the movie holds one of the worst Sci-Fi tropes; when the mine worker decides his spacesuit is full of spiders and claws at his air hose to escape causing his head to stretch out and burst.

  • Jesse Larson

    Also have to disagree. Fun movie. “…Looks clear.” Always gets a laugh out of me.

    If you want to watch sci-fi movies at all, especially movies with any action, adventure, or creature effects, in my humble opinion you might as well give up if you don’t like this movie. Or be prepared for a lot of frustration. Wherever you rate this on the scale of good-to-bad, few come out that are much better, and many come out that are much worse. In my book it’s a solid ‘good’.

    Also, is it really that cheap-looking? I mean it’s not laughably bad. Clearly they didn’t have a multi-million dollar budget, but I don’t think that alone should prevent movies from being made, or be counted strongly against them when they are.

  • sandu bogi

    I always called him Tin Weasel.

  • Anonymous

    The actual worst thing I’ve seen all week was when Alvin and the Chipmunks (2007) was on at my family’s Christmas gathering.

  • Bahimiron

    I saw Home Alone 2: Lost in New York yesterday, so clearly your title is misleading at best, sir.

  • Anonymous

    Mr. Bonk, firstly, I always love seeing your username.  It makes me happy.

    What I mean by the movie betraying its own conceit — and most horror movies do this — is that the space bats are introduced as deadly creatures until they go up against the hero, at which point they literally bump heads with each other like Keystone Kops.  David Twohy was obviously in love with that overhead shot of Riddick bending left and right in front of the space bat, but I think it looks ridiculous.  Nearly as ridiculous as Riddick deducing from a space bat skeleton that it has a blind spot.  Riddick, space paleontologist!

    However, I wouldn’t mind this stuff if the movie was better written and the characters had clearer and more consistent motivations.  I find weak material is more prone to implausibility!  If the movie was better, it would have distracted me from caring about how the characters evade the space bats.

  • Anonymous

    This is a fair point, Jesse.  I’m sure the budget was small and for the most part, the production design is pretty resourceful considering they’re trying to build a wrecked starship on a desert planet.  

    And it does have a couple of really nice shots like that image posted above.  I love sci-fi vistas like that.

  • Anonymous

    I’m going to have to disagree, Mr. Bonk.  I was on to Deisel early on.  Maybe it had to do with Iron Giant, or maybe I just know a dork when I see one — being a dork myself, of course — but I have never found Deisel convincing as a bad-ass.  His supposedly high-impact fight scene with Dwayne Johnson in Fast Five is like two frat buddies rolling around drunkenly, giggling all the while.  At least that’s the subtext I get.  Don’t get me wrong: I find Vin Deisel an incredibly likeable actor.  In fact, I’d say that’s part of the problem! :)

  • sinnick

    Pitch Black is to Aliens as The Mummy is to Raiders of the Lost Ark. Only with less Rachel Weisz. 

    I actually like Chronicles of Riddick more than Pitch Black. Yes, someone forgot to reign in the costume designer, and Judy Dench looks completely adrift, but Colm Feore was a decent villain. And I’m convinced that the Karl Urban and Thandie Newton stuff isn’t meant to be taken seriously.

  • Anonymous

    Oh dear, you’re going to make me rewatch Chronicles of Riddick, aren’t you? I remember liking Linus Roache as well. Or at least what happens to his character.

  • Scharmers

    Outland is a terrible, terrible movie, with plot holes big enough to drive really large vehicles through.  I mean, really.  One of many examples: Say you’re a skilled, experienced assassin, who has, in their career, killed many an off-worlder.  So your weapon of choice is a slug thrower, and you’re stupid enough to reflexively use said slug-thrower in an environment where punching holes in the walls leads to depressurization and death.  Sure you are.

  • Anonymous

    Oh man, I actually remember that scene now that you mention it…

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jason-McMaster/607680289 Jason McMaster

    I really like it as well. Fun movie

  • luke

    I always enjoy watching you take on nerd sacred cows, Tom.  Skip that Vin Diesel Mary Sue fest and watch Firefly instead.

  • Hahahabonk

    Can’t really disagree with any of that, I guess it just doesn’t bother me the same way. Ultimately I like the film for the way it breaks some horror film survival tropes (Dad with three kids? They’re all dying but you’ll make it pops! Bye bye plucky heroine!) and for the scene with Riddick and Rhahahadhahaha where he almost convinces her to abandon everyone. 
    The sequel gets a similar pass for Linus’ death scene and for Riddick in the prison, letting people know what object he’s going to kill them with. But I find it the weaker film despite the higher budget. Basically I wouldn’t really recommend either film to people unless I already know they have a gooey soft spot for B-movies!

    C.

  • Hahahabonk

    “Pitch Black is to Aliens as The Mummy is to Raiders of the Lost Ark. Only with less Rachel Weisz.”

    I agree with this wholeheartedly.

    C. 

  • Sarkus

    Ha!  I think I might pay to see Tom take on Firefly.  The forum reaction would be worth it alone.

  • Paul W.

    Tom, going on the point about budgets and how they affect (or rather, don’t affect) good movies:

    What is your opinion of the movie “Cube”, it was shot with something like $100,000 budget with medium effects and all on a single sound stage. Yet, I find it to be one of the more thought provoking and intriguing sci-fi movies in my current library, yet it is a super low budget film.

    Does a movie have to have a huge SFX budget to get credit? Because, if so, I think that the like of Transformers proves this is not always a winning formula.

  • Paul W.

    Wholeheartedly agree!

  • Anonymous

    I love Cube. It made Vincent Natali a director to watch for me, although I was really disappointed in Splice. I think Natali either has or had a William Gibson story (Neuromancer?) in pre-production. I have my doubts about how that would work out. But Cube has a fantastic production design. And, yes, a pretty smart script. Have you seen any of the sequels? I think the one I saw was called Cube Zero. A few interesting ideas, but it turned out to be a stinker.

    And, no, a big budget isn’t a prerequisite for good sci-fi. I submit Gattica for your consideration! I’m sure there are others, but that’s the one that comes to mind. The Man from Earth is basically a stage play written by one of the Star Trek writers that’s often cited as an example of dirt-cheap good sci-fi. Another Earth was cheap, but I didn’t like it much. Ooh, Primer! There’s a great example. What are some others?

    But the problem with Pitch Black is that the shipwreck stuff looks like something from a Star Trek set. The movie did a decent job with the CGI and cinematography, so the cheap sets stood out for me.

  • Anthonysage

    Coming from the guy who didn’t enjoy Fulchie’s Zombie (one of the best zombie movies EVER), I’m just not surprised.

  • Anonymous

    Hey, at least I know how to spell Fulci’s name! :)

    You know, “Fulchie’s Zombie” sounds like some sort of sick deviant thing you’d have to look up on Urban Dictionary.

  • balut

    Movies can always use more Rachel Weisz.

  • Foxstab

    I liked Pitch Black. Thing is, it’s not a SMART movie. It’s not for smart people, per-sa.
    It’s the kind of movie you watch when you want to switch your brain off, unwind and just enjoy some gruesome violen(t)ce action.
    Same as when you go play online games and get exposed to the world (and realize that Society/other people is a prison, so breaking out of Jail works nothing) and stop being a nice intelligent person and turn into an aggressive asshole. You play those games to unwind and satisfy your barbaric core needs, not to have a MENSA-grade discussion (although meeting intelligent people online is sometimes a plus of an added benefit).

  • MSUSteve

    Anyone can like Pitch Black, but it takes a special kind of sicko to also like The Chronicles of Riddick.  I am that sicko.