6 days to Halloween: Ghostwatch

I’m not sure whether Orson Welles’ 1938 radio broadcast of War of the Worlds is the first mockumentary, but it’s probably the first notable one for how it freaked out so many listeners. They weren’t yet accustomed to the wide range of stuff kicked off by Blair Witch Project’s success. Back then, there wasn’t even a word for mockumentaries. Another notable episode that predates jaded Blair Witch Project audiences is the 1992 BBC broadcast Ghostwatch, which is eerily prescient of reality TV and mockumentaries. There are conflicting reports about how much audiences were actually freaked out, but the reaction to the show was just as much a part of Ghostwatch as the show itself. And perhaps most surprising of all, the show itself actually holds up.

The premise is that a film crew visits a haunted house on Halloween night while a live studio broadcast checks in with them periodically. Callers call in, reporters on the scene offer updates, and experts unfold some obligatory backstory on a ghost with the unlikely name Pipes. It’s got a lot of Poltergeist going on, but with the dry British sensibility that got the Queen’s subjects through the fall of an empire, World War II, and Margaret Thatcher. BBC hosts react pretty much like you’d expect when confronted with strange goings on and unexpected developments. And I love how Ghostwatchers plays with the divide between the on-the-scene crew and the studio hosts.

You can watch the entire episode here. Save the money you would have spent on Paranormal Activity 3 and watch Ghostwatch instead. In fact, I recommend an annual Halloween viewing to share this with friends who haven’t seen it.

  • Anonymous

    I really love Ghostwatch. A Qt3 thread prompted me to watch it, and I wasn’t expecting anything nearly as well-crafted and unsettling. In addition to the treatment of the hosts and the crew, there’s also something to how it handles the viewer calls that I like — viewers call in at various times, pointing out an overlooked apparition on the video tape or contributing part of an obscure urban legend. Even 20 years later, it somehow makes me feel like part of an audience which is actively participating in the events as they unfold.

    In this way, I don’t think that Ghostwatch could have ever succeeded as a film — it’s intrinsically dependent on the medium of broadcast television. I’m not sure if there’s anything else quite like that. Hooray for tv movies, right, Tom?

    Really, really great pick.

  • Anonymous

    That’s an excellent point about the broadcast medium. It uses it as well as Blair Witch Project uses found footage. And in a weird way, Ghostwatch’s live broadcast conceit dates it almost like the War of the Worlds radio broadcast. It seems like live TV, and broadcasting really, is pretty much a dying if not dead art. One of the things I liked about the movie Catfish was how it spun a mystery out of contemporary technology and social networking. It’s such a damn shame those guys couldn’t translate that into anything similarly smart when they did their crappy take on Paranormal Activity 3.

    And in a way, your comment about the relationship between broadcast TV and Ghostwatch reminds me a bit of how Grave Encounters (I posted something about it a week or so ago) plays with the more contemporary phenomenon of reality TV shows about supernatural stuff. Too bad Grave Encounters isn’t nearly as smart as Ghostwatch or Blair Witch Project.

    Actually, that might be an ingenious intentional choice: reality TV is dumb, so the movie should be as well!

  • Anonymous

    Thanks for reminding me about Grave Encounters — I am going to have to get that in the queue. I’ve been trying to catch up on your pre-Halloween recommendations, but the opening scenes of Isolation were just too unsettling for me when I started it the other night. (Despite how much I like horror, I have very low tolerance for actually watching it.)

    It’s really unfortunate about Paranormal Activity 3, though I can’t really say I’m surprised. I didn’t really feel like the history in PA1 needed to be filled in, nor the actual events fully explained. Part of the great things about found footage is how easily it lends itself to expository gaps; I like getting to fill the holes in myself. Now the series seems reduced to using a conceit to deliver a plot that’s been explored ad nauseam elsewhere in fiction. (REC 2 suffers from a similar problem, I feel.) Nonetheless, I’m looking forward to hearing the Paranopsis and hearing you guys talk about the movie.

  • realmenhuntinpacks

    I was ten when I saw this on TV and I’m telling you, at ground zero it scared the everloving out of me and my wee pals.