ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US
News and our Home pageFirst impressions of the latest games60 Second Previews of upcoming games60 Second ReviewsTop Ten lists, amazing email, and moreShoot Club and more


Older than Old School: MechWarrior

Dynamix started out as an independent development house. They’d done a variety of tank-based games in the 80’s – Arctic Fox for Electronic Arts; Stellar 7 and Nova 9 for Sierra. They hit the jackpot with MechWarrior, published by Activision in 1989. For the first time, PC gamers actually were able to “sit inside” their ‘Mechs. Play was relatively simple, as were the EGA graphics, but, in many ways, the depth of the first MechWarrior has not been touched. The action took place pretty much wherever the player chose, with location being important to ‘Mech design (icy planets were everyone’s favorites – no heat!). There was also some additional role-playing that took place outside of the ‘Mech. MechWarrior really isn’t worth playing any more, but it certainly provides a benchmark for robot sims.

As a side note, the online-gaming company Kesmai licensed the original MechWarrior engine, and created Multi-Player Battletech. It appeared on the one of the pre-Internet network giants, GEnie. Once again, the primitive graphics of that first simulation proved to be less important to die-hard ‘Mech jockeys than the rich world they created around it. Multi-Player Battletech, using an updated (if still somewhat antiquated) engine, is still available from Kesmai.

 

The Engine that Would Not Die: MechWarrior 2 and Friends

A quick quiz: what do the following games have in common?

MechWarrior 2, MechWarrior 2: Ghost Bear’s Legacy, MechWarrior: Mercenaries, MechWarrior 2:Titanium Trilogy, Interstate ’76 (Nitro AND Gold Editions), Heavy Gear, and Battlezone?

Simple. They all share the same engine – created in 1995 by a team working under Activision. This was the engine created for MechWarrior 2. The game had a very difficult birth – it was over a year late (a big deal at the time), and had more than one development team – the first team had been fired. The wait, however, had been worth it. MechWarrior 2was a rich, deep simulation of ‘Mech combat. The graphics were extremely good for their time, pushing the machines of the mid-90’s era to the limit. It did have a few flaws – the “Circle of Death” was introduced, and has been plaguing ‘Mech games ever since; weapons were unbalanced and could be abused (nothing could stop a medium-laser and two-LRM-20 Mad Cat); multiplayer was flaky at best. The mission structure was also very fixed, and, since you were playing on the side of the resource-rich clans, salvage was not an issue.

All of this changed – or should have changed, in the MechWarrior 2 sequel, Mercenaries (1996). Looking back, Mercenaries is the real benchmark for ‘Mech games. In it, the player took on the part of a mercenary lance commander, with the freedoms and responsibilities thereof. It featured relatively free-form play (random missions build around a central plot), proper salvage and economic rules, lots of ‘Mechs, a complete ‘Mech building system, textured-polygon graphics (!), and Windows-based multiplayer. It was just too bad that, on release, very little of what made Mercenaries interesting worked! A year passed before Mercenaries settled down to become the game it was originally promised to be. The final V1.08 patch provided completely revamped salvage rules, fixed multiplayer, and had complete Direct3D graphics.

The Titanium Trilogy contained the Direct3D ports of both MechWarrior 2 games, as well as the Ghost Bear expansion. Despite somewhat dated graphics that are fixed at 640x480 (making it perfect full-screen anti-aliasing fodder on a V5 card), it’s modern enough to still be worth playing. There are still enough Titaniums out there in bargain bins to make the purchase relatively easy.


© 2000-2001 Quarter to Three Inc. All rights reserved.
Read our disclaimer.

 

 

Site Meter

Support Qt3

Buy stuff from Amazon
GoGamer's deals

EB Games


Message Boards
Got news or comments? Email Us


What's New

March 18, 2003

:60 review: C&C Generals


March 13, 2003

Flight Sim Follies, 03 2003
Brad Wardell on IGF 2003


March 10, 2003

:60 review: Kung Fu Chaos (Xbox)


March 6, 2003

:60 review: Freelancer
:60 review: Unreal 2


March 3, 2003

Geryk's MOO3 rebuttal
:60 review: Dark Cloud 2 (PS2)
:60 review: Shrouded Isles


February 21, 2003

60: review: Master of Orion 3


July 8, 2002

Early Hours: Warcraft III
:60 review: Gore
:60 review: Ico (PS2)
:60 review: Eternal Darkness (GC)


June 19, 2002

:60 review: Dungeon Siege
:60 review: Castle Wolfenstein
:60 review: Silent Hunter II
:60 review: Destroyer Command


June 18, 2002

Shoot Club: EB or not EB?
:60 review: Laser Squad Nemesis
:60 review: Morrowind
:60 review: Freedom Force


February 5, 2002

Shoot Club: Aliens vs. Sex


January 9, 2002

Feature: 2001: A new kind of year


January 8, 2002

:60 review: Rails across America
:60 review: IL-2: Strumovik
:60 review: Pikmin (Gamecube)
:60 review: World War III
:60 review: Throne of Darkness
:60 review: Yuri's Revenge


December 11, 2001

:60 review: Sega Tennis 2k2 (DC)
:60 review: Burnout (PS2)
:60 review: Grand Theft Auto 3 (PS2)
:60 review: Smuggler's Run 2 (PS2)
:60 review: Tony Hawk 3 (PS2)
:60 review: DOA3 (Xbox)
:60 review: Halo (Xbox)
:60 review: Project Gotham (Xbox)
:60 review: Galactic Battlegrounds
:60 review: Majestic
:60 review: Real War
:60 review: Red Faction
:60 review: Rogue Spear Black Thorn
:60 review: Shattered Galaxy
:60 review: Sub Command
:60 review: Vietnam: Squad Battles
:60 review: Weakest Link


October 2, 2001

Early Hours: Silent Hill 2


September 21, 2001

Early Hours: Empire Earth beta


September 18, 2001

Tim Chown on ECTS 2001
Shoot Club: After September 11, 2001


Old message boards
Chat

About Us